Shabazz v. Texas Youth Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Plaintiff is precluded from bringing an action under the ADA, just as he is under Title VII, against a person acting for an employer”
• holding that “Plaintiff is precluded from bringing an action under the ADA, just as he is under Title VII, against a person acting for an employer”
• holding that “due to the similarity in the definitions of ‘employers’ under Title VII, the ADEA, and the ADA... . that personal capacity suits are likewise prohibited under the ADA.”
• dismissing the plaintiff’s claim under Rule 12(b)(6) where the plaintiff alleged that he filed a charge but failed to allege that a right to sue letter was issued or received
• dismissing pro se plaintiff’s discrimination claims because “[e]ven if Plaintiff were able to prove all the facts alleged in the Complaint, they do not show that Plaintiff received a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).