MacHinchick v. PB Power, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “age stereotyping remarks” made by terminating supervisor to plaintiff supported inference of age discrimination at prima facie stage
• confirming that “at summary judgment, the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting analysis still applies to discrimination claims” brought under Texas’s antidiscrimination laws
• confirming that McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting analysis applies to discrimination claims brought under the TCHRA
• finding plaintiff failed to raise a fact issue as to his willingness and ability to adapt
• finding inference that plaintiff was terminated because of his age where supervisor called defendant “inflexible,” “not adaptable,” and possessing a “business-as-usual attitude”
• considering plaintiff’s evidence as a whole to determine whether discrimination was a motivating factor in adverse employment decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).