Davis v. City of Grapevine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when conflicting inferences may be drawn between a party’s summary judgment affidavit and his deposition on matters of material fact, a fact issue is presented
• holding that when conflicting inferences may be drawn between a party = s summary judgment affidavit and his deposition on matters of material fact, a fact issue is presented
• holding that a plaintiff establishes her prima facie case based on her employer's failure to provide reasonable accommodation by proving that, with reasonable accommodations, she could perform the essential functions of her job and that the employer refused to make those accommodations
• holding that a plaintiff establishes her prima facie case based on her employer's failure to provide reasonable accommodation by proving that, with reasonable accommodations, she could perform the essential functions of her job and that the employer refused to make those accommodations
• holding that a plaintiff establishes her prima facie case based on her employer’s failure to provide reasonable accommodation by proving that, with reasonable accommodations, she could perform the essential functions of her job and that the employer refused to make those accommodations
• holding ultimatum standard met when manager informed employee that “it would be in his best interest if he decided to resign rather than be terminated because future employers may ask the City whether Davis resigned or was terminated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).