MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injunction did not discharge creditor because third-party interest could be asserted against settlement fund
• holding that a channeling injunction applied only to \third parties [who] seek to collect out of the proceeds of Manville's insurance policies on the basis of Manville's conduct\
• holding that a plaintiff was bound by a settlement approved by a bankruptcy court where “notice of proposed settlements issued by the Bankruptcy Court met the requirements of due process”
• confirming that it was appropriate to enjoin creditors from pursuing claims that belonged to the debtors and that the debtors had released
• noting that court had made factual finding that suits would \adversely affect property of the estate and would interfere with reorganization\
• stating that the bankruptcy court has inherent equitable power to sell a debtor's property and transfer third-party interests to the proceeds of the sale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-10-03· cited 129×