Monarch Life Insurance v. Ropes & Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “express[ing] no view” on precedents addressing the propriety of third-party releases nor their applicability to the particular plan at issue, but giving preclusive effect to a final order confirming a plan of reorganization and barring certain claims against third parties
• \The applicability vel non of preclusion principles is a question of law.\
• “Section 105 grants bankruptcy courts ample power to enjoin actions excepted from the automatic stay which might interfere in the rehabilitative process, whether in a liquidation or in a reorganization case.” (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).