Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[w]e insist that a party seek a stay even if it may seem highly unlikely that the bankruptcy court will issue one\
• noting that whether the appellant sought a stay of confirmation is a “chief consideration” under Chateaugay II
• noting that whether the appellant sought a stay of confirmation is a “chief consideration” under Chateaugay II
• stating that “[w]e insist that a party seek a stay even if it may seem highly unlikely that the bankruptcy court will issue one”
• noting that “[e]quitable mootness is a doctrine distinct from constitutional mootness, though they have been discussed in the same breath”
• noting that \[a] chief” Chateaugay factor \is whether the appellant sought a stay of confirmation .... We insist that a party seek a stay even if it may seem highly unlikely that the bankruptcy court will issue one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).