In Re United States Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contract action was core, notwithstanding the fact that it was based on pre-petition contracts
• determining that bankruptcy court need not compel arbitration of insurance declaratory judgment action under FAA
• recognizing “the degree to which the 7 proceeding is independent of [debtor’s] reorganization” to be relevant to its core status post- 8 Marathon
• “Notwithstanding that the Trust's claims are upon pre-petition contracts, we conclude that the impact these contracts have on other core bankruptcy functions nevertheless render the proceedings core.”
• finding claims based on pre-petition insurance contracts, potentially the estate’s “most important asset,” to be core
• finding coverage complaint was core because of “pay first” structure of insurance policies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).