Skip to main content

Luttrell v. United Telephone System, Inc.

Citations

  • 695 P.2d 1279
  • 9 Kan. App. 2d 620
  • 236 Kan. 710
  • 683 P.2d 1292
  • 47 A.L.R. 4th 669
  • 1984 Kan. App. LEXIS 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the employer who is evaluating or investigating an employee in good faith is protected from defamation lawsuits by the enhanced burden of proof required to show that the employer has abused its qualified privilege
  • qualified privilege for in-tracorporate publication of alleged defamation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Parks, Swinehart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.