· 10/4/1982
Kelly v. General Telephone Co.
Citations
- 136 Cal. App. 3d 278
- 186 Cal. Rptr. 184
- 1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that spreading of deliberately false statements that employee in effect committed forgery constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct
- imputing to plaintiff forgery of invoices slanderous per se as charging commission of criminal offense
- “The statement that plaintiff falsified invoices was slanderous per se in that it charged plaintiff with forgery.”
- setting forth elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dalsimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.