Skip to main content
· 10/4/1982

Kelly v. General Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 136 Cal. App. 3d 278
  • 186 Cal. Rptr. 184
  • 1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that spreading of deliberately false statements that employee in effect committed forgery constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct
  • imputing to plaintiff forgery of invoices slanderous per se as charging commission of criminal offense
  • “The statement that plaintiff falsified invoices was slanderous per se in that it charged plaintiff with forgery.”
  • setting forth elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dalsimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.