Skip to main content
D. Kansas· 11/26/2018

Caranchini v. Peck

Citations

  • 355 F. Supp. 3d 1052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that KPSPA’s requirements for a hearing within thirty days and a stay of discovery were procedural and did not apply in diversity case
  • applying Kansas' anti-SLAPP statute and only considering pleadings and affidavits in second step, when deciding whether responding party met its burden
  • noting that “it is not convinced that . . . the mandatory discovery stay provisions of the Act are applicable in federal diversity actions, as those provisions are strictly procedural in nature and do not affect the outcome of the case (citing Metabolife)
  • the court “is not convinced that the requirement that a court hold a hearing within 30 days and the mandatory discovery stay provisions of the Act are applicable in federal diversity actions, as those provisions are strictly procedural in nature and do not affect the outcome of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murguia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.