Hagebak v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a qualified privilege for intracorporate communication, meaning that statements made by an statute of limitations on a defamation claim begins to run at the time of initial publication. See e.g., Fikes v. Furst, 61 P.3d 855, 860 (N.M. Ct. App. 2002
• holding it was error to grant summary judgment “merely on the basis of the same alleged conduct” between the plaintiffs defamation claim and prima facie tort claim because the plaintiff was “entitled to a reasonable opportunity to marshall sufficient evidence to prove his case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).