Skip to main content

Lum v. State

Citations

  • 101 A.3d 970
  • 2014 Del. LEXIS 417
  • 2014 WL 4667089

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, when determining if there was sufficient evidence, the Delaware Supreme Court does not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence
  • noting that, when determining if there was sufficient evidence, the Delaware Supreme Court does not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence
  • noting that, when determining if there was sufficient evidence, the Delaware Supreme Court does not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence
  • finding that argument made in reply brief did not rectify waiver of issue not properly raised in body of opening brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.