Skip to main content

Americas Mining Corp. v. Theriault

Citations

  • 51 A.3d 1213
  • 2012 WL 4335192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendants contended that a stock-for-stock merger would increase the number of outstanding shares, which 19 would “improve stockholder liquidity, generate more analyst exposure, and create a more efficient market for Southern Peru shares”
  • identifying benefit achieved as “the first and most important of the Sugarland factors”
  • “When a transaction involving self-dealing by a controlling shareholder is challenged, the applicable standard of judicial review is entire fairness, with the defendants having the burden of persuasion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Holland, Ridgely, Steele, Vaughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

155 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.