Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 6/29/2017

Luka v. Bard College

Citations

  • 263 F. Supp. 3d 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that remarks about age that were neither “made close in time nor in relation to the specific employment decision” did not raise an inference of discrimination
  • discussing factors to consider to “determine whether a particular comment is probative of discriminatory animus”
  • dismissing disability discrimination claim where discriminatory animus was based on stray remarks
  • “As a general matter, verbal comments may raise an inference of discrimination, but not where they lack a causal nexus to the termination decision.” (citation marks and citation omitted)
  • “Isolated comments, while potentially offensive, do not lead to an inference of discriminatory intent.”
  • “Isolated comments, while potentially offensive, do not lead to an inference of discriminatory intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.