Anthony P. Capobianco, Jr. v. City of New York and New York City Department of Sanitation, Docket No. 04-3230-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court erred by sua sponte excluding evidence on summary judgment in the absence of the parties’ objections
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in excluding unsworn documents because the plaintiff should have been allowed to obtain a curative affidavit
• holding that an unsworn letter could be considered in support of a plaintiff’s opposition to a summary judgment motion where the letter was submitted by the defendants
• explaining that major life activities can include such activities as, inter alia, working and performing manual tasks
• holding defendants waived objections to the admissibility of documents cited in their statement of facts and briefs
• explaining that, as a general matter, unsworn expert statements are inadmissible hearsay on a motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).