United States v. Murry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intervention forty-five days after court’s decision on a summary judgment motion was not untimely because final judgment had not yet been rendered
• all of proposed intervener’s defenses went to the heart of original claims brought by plaintiff, who was party opposing motion to intervene
• permissive intervention actually would be of benefit to party opposing motion
• allegations of noise, traffic, safety, and loss of property value sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).