· 7/15/2002
Taylor v. Books a Million, Inc.
Citations
- 296 F.3d 376
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14165
- 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,119
- 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 577
- 2002 WL 1378576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a suit 91 days after receiving the right-to-sue notice was untimely because the 90-day deadline is to be “strictly construed
- holding that in order to avoid inequity, courts must construe pro se plaintiff’s pleadings liberally
- noting that courts have presumed receipt dates ranging from three to seven days after mailing
- noting that “[t]he EEOC issued a right-to-sue letter on September 29, 2000” and calculating the limitations based on that date
- explaining that “[e]mployment discrimination plaintiffs must exhaust administrative remedies before pursuing claims in federal court”
- observing that “this circuit has repeatedly dismissed cases in which the plaintiff did not file until after the ninety-day limitation period had expired”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Demoss, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.