Skip to main content
· 7/15/2002

Taylor v. Books a Million, Inc.

Citations

  • 296 F.3d 376
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14165
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,119
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 577
  • 2002 WL 1378576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a suit 91 days after receiving the right-to-sue notice was untimely because the 90-day deadline is to be “strictly construed
  • holding that in order to avoid inequity, courts must construe pro se plaintiff’s pleadings liberally
  • noting that courts have presumed receipt dates ranging from three to seven days after mailing
  • noting that “[t]he EEOC issued a right-to-sue letter on September 29, 2000” and calculating the limitations based on that date
  • explaining that “[e]mployment discrimination plaintiffs must exhaust administrative remedies before pursuing claims in federal court”
  • observing that “this circuit has repeatedly dismissed cases in which the plaintiff did not file until after the ninety-day limitation period had expired”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Demoss, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.