Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/17/2002

Long v. State

Citations

807 A.2d 1
371 Md. 72
2002 Md. LEXIS 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that court improperly entered a modified consent order that “materially altered the agreement reached by the parties”
holding that it was error for the court to enter a modified agreement which materially altered the agreement reached by the parties
holding that the court erred in entering a modified consent order which undermined and materially altered the terms of the parties’ agreement
stating that a consent order is a hybrid, “having attributes of both contracts and judicial decrees”
noting that consent judgments have the same force and effect as other judgments
“[T]he purpose of [sanctioning] the contemnor is remedial, ... i.e. .... ‘to compel obedience to orders’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.