Sy-Lene of Washington, Inc. v. Starwood Urban Retail II, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that parol evidence showing the meaning of contract language “is only admissible after the court finds the contract to be ambiguous”
• stating that parol evidence is admissible to show the meaning of contract language only after the court has found the contract language to be ambiguous
• “When the clear language of a contract is unambiguous, the court will give effect to its plain, ordinary, and usual meaning, taking into account the context in which it is used.”
• “When the clear language of a contract is unambiguous, the court will give effect to its plain, ordinary, and usual meaning, taking into account the context in which it is used.”
• “Under the objective test of contract interpretation, the written language embodying the terms of an agreement will govern the rights and liabilities of the parties, irrespective of the intent of the parties at the time they entered into the contract.” (Cleaned up)
• applying rules of contract interpretation to lease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).