Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/17/1973
State v. Roll and Scholl
Citations
- 298 A.2d 867
- 267 Md. 714
- 69 A.L.R. 3d 483
- 1973 Md. LEXIS 1288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In Maryland, “the nature of the proceeding is determined before the time for imposing punishment is reached.”
- for a finding of criminal contempt, the failure or inability to comply with the court order must be “caused by a deliberate effort or a wilful act of commission or omission by the alleged contemnor committed with the knowledge that it would frustrate the order of the court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, McWilliams, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 201×
- In re Marriage of BettsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-28· cited 193×
- Jerry Parker, Jr. v. Kenneth TurnerSixth Circuit· 1980-09-19· cited 138×
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-05· cited 92×
- Scialdone v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2010-02-25· cited 65×
- County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-11· cited 64×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-03-10· cited 62×
- Surratt v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-04· cited 50×
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-17· cited 48×
- In Re CraneSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-01-07· cited 43×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-10· cited 42×
- Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-05-13· cited 40×
- Rawlings v. RawlingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-05· cited 40×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-05-31· cited 39×
- Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-12-04· cited 38×
- Whitaker v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-28· cited 35×
- Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-07· cited 32×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 32×
- Giant of Maryland, Inc. v. State's AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-03-07· cited 31×
- Harryman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-29· cited 30×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 732×
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-04-21· cited 462×
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 357×
- Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-04-14· cited 357×
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 347×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 344×
- Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 327×
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 208×
- Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-04· cited 86×
- In the Interest of S. L. T.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-11-16· cited 61×
- Duemling v. Fort Wayne Community Concerts, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1963-03-01· cited 44×
- Ong Hing v. ThurstonArizona Supreme Court· 1966-07-08· cited 35×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-01-13· cited 34×
- McDaniel v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-10· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.