Smith v. Luber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the public policy encouraging settlements is so strong that settlement agreements will not be disturbed on the grounds of mistake or withdrawal of consent by a 21 party”
• appeal from a consent decree purporting to memorialize the terms of an agreement placed on the record appropriate where the consent decree failed to reflect the parties’ agreement
• trial judge is afforded a “wide latitude”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).