Skip to main content
· 3/1/2001

Committee for Responsible Development on 25th Street v. Mayor of Baltimore

Citations

  • 767 A.2d 906
  • 137 Md. App. 60
  • 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “to be considered an aggrieved party, the complaining property owner must be in ‘sight or sound’ range” of the subject property
  • denying the adjoining property owner standing to a resident challenging issuance of a demolition and construction permit by Baltimore City Board of Municipal and Zoning Appeals
  • denying the adjoining property owner standing to a resident challenging issuance of a demolition and construction permit by Baltimore City Board of Municipal and Zoning Appeals
  • standing is based on a legal interest “such as ‘one of property’, one arising out of a contract, one protected against tortious invasion, or one founded on a statute that confers a privilege”
  • protestant who lived two blocks west and three blocks north and alleged change in historic nature of neighborhood was not specially aggrieved
  • “[T]o be considered an aggrieved party, the complaining property owner must be in ‘sight or sound’ range of the property that is the subject of his complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.