Skip to main content

Weaver v. State

Citations

  • 725 N.E.2d 945
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 429
  • 2000 WL 326146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing appeal on merits in part because the appellant’s liberty interest in not being incarcerated was at stake
  • any time defendant whose liberty has been restricted through incarceration/confinement presents a legitimate issue concerning credit time, court must address merits of such motion
  • “Indeed, a sentence that violates express statutory authority is facially defective.”
  • \[A] sentence that violates express statutory authority is facially defective.\
  • discussing inapplicability of res judicata to motions like Adams’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Najam, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.