Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 4/17/2019

Lloyd's Syndicate 457 v. FloaTEC, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 921 F.3d 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “attacks on [a valid] arbitration agreement’s existence [were] step one matters for the courts, not arbitrators”
  • noting that the court cannot “blue-pencil” an extra clause into the contract
  • \The first step is a question of contract formation only-did the parties form a valid agreement to arbitrate some set of claims. This inquiry is for the court.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “The first step is a question of contract formation only—did the parties form a valid agreement to arbitrate some set of claims. This inquiry is for the court.” 5 Case: 18-60749 Document: 00515002949 Page: 6 Date Filed: 06/19/2019 No. 18-60749 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • discussing recent Supreme Court cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Duncan, Engelhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lloyd's Syndicate 457 v. FloaTEC, L.L.C.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.