Freudensprung v. Offshore Technical Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court order that stayed arbitration without “lengthy factual and legal conclusions” and “administratively closed” the case did not satisfy Rule 58
• requiring that a party to the arbitration agreement not be a United States citizen for the Court to compel arbitration
• stating that the FAA applies to the extent that it is not in conflict with the Convention
• noting that a court may exercise specific jurisdiction if: “(1) the defendant purposely directed its activities toward the forum state or purposely availed itself of the privileges of conducting activities there; and (2
• considering jurisdictional argument premised on the Convention that was raised for the first time in a 28(j) letter prior to oral argument
• finding a commercial legal relationship where the plaintiff had a “Consultant’s Agreement” with the defendant to provide professional services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).