Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]hough ... the Interstate policy could have more clearly delineated its payment obligation, ‘that fact does not mandate the conclusion that the policy was legally ambiguous.’ ”
• “ambiguous contractual provision is to be construed against the drafter, or, as originating in the insurance context, in favor of the insured.”
• “If after applying the other general rules of construction an ambiguity remains, the ambiguous contractual provision is to be construed against the drafter, or, as originating in the insurance context, in favor of the insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).