Skip to main content
· 9/20/2002

Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

Citations

  • 227 F. Supp. 2d 838
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20048
  • 2002 WL 31374905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that extensive regulation of the pharmaceutical industry did not justify federal officer removal ju risdiction for pharmaceutical company
  • remanding suit against drug manufacturer and non-diverse pharmacies even though “[t]he pleadings are general in their nature; the specifics few”
  • “a 15 federal court should hesitate before pronouncing a state claim frivolous, unreasonable, and not 16 even colorable in an area yet untouched by the state courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.