· 2/5/2003
Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.
Citations
- 251 F. Supp. 2d 1315
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4439
- 2003 WL 1451867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the uncertainty over whether state or federal procedural rules control
- “When considering a motion to remand, the district court accepts as true all relevant allegations contained in the complaint and construes all factual ambiguities in favor of the plaintiff.”
- proper joinder under Mississippi Rule 20 would be improper under Federal Rule 20
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bramlette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.