Skip to main content
· 2/5/2003

Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.

Citations

  • 251 F. Supp. 2d 1315
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4439
  • 2003 WL 1451867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the uncertainty over whether state or federal procedural rules control
  • “When considering a motion to remand, the district court accepts as true all relevant allegations contained in the complaint and construes all factual ambiguities in favor of the plaintiff.”
  • proper joinder under Mississippi Rule 20 would be improper under Federal Rule 20

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bramlette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.