Ohio Supreme Court· 5/30/1973

Peterson v. Teodosio

Citations

34 Ohio St. 2d 161
297 N.E.2d 113
63 Ohio Op. 2d 262
1973 Ohio LEXIS 364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint to add facts to establish an exception to a statute-of- limitations defense
stating that a court is permitted to consider both the complaint and answer in resolving the question of law presented by a Civ.R. 12(C) motion
stating that a court is permitted to consider both the complaint and answer in resolving the question of law presented by a Civ.R. 12(C) motion
“The spirit of the Civil Rules is the resolution of cases upon their merits, not upon pleading deficiencies.”
“The spirit of the Civil Rules is the resolution of cases upon their merits, not upon pleading deficiencies.”
“The spirit of the Civil Rules is the resolution of cases upon their merits, not upon pleading deficiencies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Fourth, Herbert, Neill, Stephenson, Stern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

281 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.