Skip to main content
D. Connecticut· 12/15/2017

Liston-Smith v. Csaa Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 287 F. Supp. 3d 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the chemical reaction is a process that can cause tangible, physical property damage; it does not qualify as a compensable loss in and of itself.”
  • concluding insurance policy did not cover deteriorating concrete in property in part on basis that the policy \specifie[d] that walls that exhibit cracking are not considered to be in a state of collapse\
  • ʺBecause the court concludes that CSAAʹs denial of coverage was proper, plaintiffsʹ claim that CSAAʹs alleged breach of contract was part of a general unfair business practice fails as a matter of law.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.