Cortes v. MTA New York City Transit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The unreviewed findings of an agency are... admissible as evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 803(8)(A)(iii) as “factual findings from a legally authorized investigation’ by a public office.” (quoting Federal Rules of Evidence 803(8)(A)(iii))
• refusing to infer causation based on 14‐month gap

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).