Zulick v. Patrons Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• not considering evidence of insured’s subjective intent with respect to desired scope of coverage because policy was clear and unambiguous
• trial court’s rendering of summary judgment in favor of defendant on breach of contract claim was proper, therefore, there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether application of policy constituted violation of extracontractual claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).