Skip to main content

Burns v. Koellmer

Citations

  • 11 Conn. App. 375
  • 527 A.2d 1210
  • 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs cause of action did not arise until defendant breached agreement by refusing to compensate plaintiff fully for her services
  • stating that the cause of action arose when “the defendant breached the agreement by refusing to fully compensate the plaintiff for her services”
  • finding that recovery in quantum meruit was appropriate because CT Page 1581 the complaint did not allege an express contract
  • \when causes of action . . . are separate and distinct . . . separate counts are necessary or indeed ordinarily desirable.\
  • action based on agreement between parties for payment of additional compensation accrued at time employer refused to pay, not at failure to pay during course of employment
  • quantum meruit and unjust enrichment may support recovery between unmarried couple

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dupont

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.