Skip to main content

Liimatta v. Vest

Citations

  • 45 P.3d 310
  • 2002 Alas. LEXIS 44
  • 2002 WL 538943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s pre-accident drug seeking condition was relevant to claim for loss of enjoyment of life and reversing trial court decision to exclude related evidence
  • holding that prejudgment interest cannot be awarded if it would amount to double recovery
  • “Medical records kept by hospitals and doctors are often admitted under the business records exception.”
  • denominating \free medical and dental care\ as \collateral source benefits\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.