Gibson v. GEICO General Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion of testimony about an insurance contract and an insurance settlement under Rule 403 rather than Rule 411
• “The appropriate standard of review for evidentiary decisions is abuse of discretion.” (quoting Buster v. Gale, 866 P.2d 837, 841 n.9 (Alaska 1994))
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to advise jury about auto insurer’s status as the UIM carrier and the nature of UIM claim
• \This court reviews a trial court's discovery rulings for abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).