Landers v. Municipality of Anchorage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party has no duty to continue objecting during trial to challenge initial denial of motion in limine on appeal
• explaining that an irreplaceable item’s special value under § 911 may be based on such things as original cost or cost to reproduce
• discussing prior Alaska cases on pets and other items of personal property
• party claiming IIED must demonstrate both severity of emotional distress and bad conduct of offending party
• trial judge apprised of evidence of sentimental value of private property destroyed by police
• proper standard for measuring damages resulting from destruction of photographs and videotapes was their value to the owner, which could include such items as cost of replacement, original cost, and cost to reproduce, but not sentimental and emotional value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).