Skip to main content

Bauman v. Day

Citations

  • 892 P.2d 817
  • 1995 Alas. LEXIS 30
  • 1995 WL 126880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims for fraud and misrepresentation are tort claims, and thus are subject to the two-year statute of limitations
  • reasoning that homeowners were not initially on inquiry notice of permafrost-related issues with their property \because the presence of permafrost is not something that [the owners] could ascertain merely by observing the property\
  • applying discovery rule to breach of contract ease involving a latent defect in real property; extending rule to common law contract causes of action
  • applying discovery rule to breach of contract case involving a latent defect in real property; extending rule to common law contract causes of action
  • discussing policy reasons for applying a discovery rule to statutes of limitations governing contract actions
  • \[N]othing in [a prior case] relaxes the 'reasonable person' standard so much as to allow the statute of limitations to run only when the person has actual knowledge of the fraud.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eastaugh, Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bauman v. Day

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.