Getchell v. Lodge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding police officer’s “fact” and “expert” testimony constituted hybrid expert testimony subject to and permissible under Evidence Rule 702
• concluding police officer's \fact\ and \expert\ testimony constituted hybrid expert testimony subject to and permissible under Evidence Rule 702
• noting that the exclusion of traffic citations in negligence cases is generally \based in part on the rationale that such testimony amounts to an opinion on an ultimate issue that is for the trier of fact to decide ... and in part on the undue weight concerns\
• upholding the admissibility of a police officer's testimony implying that a driver had not been negligent in a motor vehicle accident where she skidded to avoid a moose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).