Carl J. Perreira and Christina J. Perreira, Parents and Next Friend of Carly C. Perreira v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an award of fees and costs was not authorized for work performed on a case after a claim lost its reasona- ble basis
• concluding that special master did not err by “requir[ing] the [expert] opinion to be more than unsupported speculation”
• holding that an “expert opinion is no better than the soundness of the reasons supporting it.”
• holding that “an award of fees and costs was not authorized for work performed on a case after a claim lost its reasonable basis”
• holding that “an award of fees and costs was not authorized for work performed on a case after a claim lost its reasonable basis[]”
• stating that “counsel’s duty to zealously represent their client does not relieve them of their duty to the court to avoid frivolous litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).