United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edwin Velasquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Velasquez’s expert “would have assisted the jury in determining the proper weight to accord [the government’s expert’s] testimony”
• reversing trial court’s preclusion of proffered expert testimony concerning handwriting analysis because evidence sufficiently reliable under Rule 702
• reversing trial court’s preclusion of proffered expert testimony concerning handwriting analysis because evidence sufficiently reliable under Rule 702
• questioning the propriety of applying Daubert to handwriting analysis, but applying it in an exercise of caution
• dis- cussing standard methodology applied by handwriting analysts, and upholding admission of expert handwriting testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).