Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 2/28/1983

Lewis v. Graves

Citations

  • 701 F.2d 245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Rule 23.1 and finding that “post-complaint events are not relevant”
  • demand not excused on the basis that plaintiff named as defendants more than a majority of [the] corporation’s then serving directors
  • “bald charges of mere failure to take corrective action are similarly inadequate to demonstrate futility”
  • “[T]he decision as to whether a plaintiff’s allegations of futility are sufficient to excuse demand depends on the particular facts of each case and lies within the discretion of the district court.”
  • “[T]he decision as to 10 whether a plaintiff’s allegations of futility are sufficient to excuse demand 11 depends on the particular facts of each case and lies within the discretion of the 12 district court.”
  • “[T]he decision as to 10 whether a plaintiff’s allegations of futility are sufficient to excuse demand 11 depends on the particular facts of each case and lies within the discretion of the 12 district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.