H. M. Greenspun v. Del E. Webb Corporation, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that demand on the president/direetor and general counsel of the corporation was insufficient under Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
• sufficiency of demand turns on sufficiency of the authority to whom the demand is presented, and the sufficiency of the demand’s content
• “The district court determined that Greenspun failed to make a demand and that such a demand would not have been futile. We must affirm unless the district court abused its dis- cretion in reaching this conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).