Dorothy Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., and Stelux Manufacturing Co., and Bulova Watch Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that dismissal granting leave to amend is not final, but where the dismissal ends the action, that order is final
• recognizing that dismissal granting leave to amend is not final, but where the dismissal ends the action, that order is final
• recognizing that it is well settled that a dismissal granting leave to amend is not final, and concluding that if the district court dismisses the complaint without further comment, then the dismissal order is final because in that case the district court intended to terminate the action
• recognizing that it is well settled that a dismissal granting leave to amend is not final, and concluding that if the district court dismisses the complaint without further comment, then the dismissal order is final because in that case the district court intended to terminate the action
• recognizing that it is well settled that a dismissal granting leave to amend is not final, and concluding that if the district court dismisses the complaint without further comment, then the dismissal order is final because in that case the district court intended to terminate the action
• \[i]t appears to be well established that a district court's order dismissing a complaint but granting leave to amend the complaint is not final and therefore not appealable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).