First Circuit· 3/29/1982
Stanley M. Grossman v. Edward C. Johnson, 3rd
Citations
- 674 F.2d 115
- 65 A.L.R. Fed. 525
- 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1444
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- bare allegations of wrongful participation or acquiescence insufficient to show directors’ conflict with corporate interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Bownes, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-03-19· cited 293×
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 281×
- In Re Sonus Networks, Inc.First Circuit· 2007-08-16· cited 119×
- In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationSixth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 118×
- Lewis v. GravesSecond Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 82×
- Ana Josefina Gonzalez Turul v. Rogatol Distributors, Inc., Belisario Araujo and Guillermo AraujoFirst Circuit· 1991-11-27· cited 64×
- DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, v. Anita COLBERT, Plaintiff-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1982-11-05· cited 44×
- Thomas M. Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardD.C. Circuit· 1988-12-09· cited 39×
- Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., and Cash Equivalent FundSeventh Circuit· 1990-07-18· cited 39×
- Boland v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-31· cited 38×
- Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities LLCNinth Circuit· 2010-12-02· cited 24×
- Kaufman v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.D. Kansas· 1986-05-29· cited 22×
- Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Savings & Loan Ass'nE.D. Virginia· 1983-08-02· cited 22×
- Tarlov v. Paine Webber Cashfund, Inc.D. Connecticut· 1983-03-15· cited 20×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,845 Martin Fox v. Reich & Tang, Inc. And Daily Income Fund, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-10-26· cited 18×
- Seidel v. Public Service Co. of New HampshireD. New Hampshire· 1985-08-27· cited 18×
- MOZES ON BEHALF OF GENERAL ELEC. CO. v. WelchD. Connecticut· 1986-06-26· cited 15×
- Strougo Ex Rel. the Brazil Fund, Inc. v. PadegsS.D. New York· 1998-11-18· cited 13×
- Unión De Empleados De Muelles De Puerto Rico PRSSA Welfare Plan v. UBS Financial Services Inc.First Circuit· 2013-01-04· cited 11×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,878×
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,072×
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 482×
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 435×
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanFirst Circuit· 1973-05-14· cited 157×
- Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court· 1909-05-03· cited 107×
- Shlensky v. DorseyThird Circuit· 1978-03-06· cited 96×
- Blau v. Mission Corp.Second Circuit· 1954-06-07· cited 88×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,297 Charles Heit v. Walter S. BairdFirst Circuit· 1977-12-29· cited 73×
- Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers BurginFirst Circuit· 1971-06-23· cited 67×
- Galef v. AlexanderSecond Circuit· 1980-01-22· cited 67×
- Gustin-Bacon Division v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 65×
- Cramer v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp.Third Circuit· 1978-07-18· cited 51×
- Markowitz v. BrodyS.D. New York· 1981-05-20· cited 29×
- Weiss v. Temporary Investment Fund, Inc.D. Delaware· 1981-06-17· cited 27×
- Grossman v. JohnsonD. Massachusetts· 1981-04-07· cited 22×
- Mills v. Esmark, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1981-06-18· cited 21×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,517 Walter Untermeyer, Jr. v. Fidelity Daily Income TrustFirst Circuit· 1978-08-02· cited 20×
- Lucking v. DelanoSixth Circuit· 1941-01-09· cited 17×
- Mark Dottenheim v. Clint W. Murchison, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1956-01-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.