D'ADDARIO v. Geller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exercise of personal jurisdiction comported with due process in a nationwide service of process case because \there is no evidence in the record suggesting extreme inconvenience or unfairness in litigating in this forum....\
• holding that the exercise of personal jurisdiction comported with due process in a nationwide service of process case because “there is no evidence in the record suggesting extreme inconvenience or unfairness in litigating in this forum....”
• finding that a Court may exercise jurisdiction on a ground sua sponte despite a party’s failure to even argue that basis
• explaining that while a colorable federal claim may be used to initially establish pendent in personam jurisdiction over the remaining claims, “if the court were to later determine that the federal claim(s
• stating that the corporate agents “cannot hide behind a ‘fiduciary shield’ to avoid personal jurisdiction” where they “allegedly committed acts under the guise of acting on behalf of and for the benefit of the corporation”
• RICO claim was “at least arguable and nonfrivolous, even if plaintiff ultimately may not prevail on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).