New York Court of Appeals· 1/12/1972
Leo Silfen, Inc. v. Cream
Citations
- 29 N.Y.2d 387
- 278 N.E.2d 636
- 328 N.Y.S.2d 423
- 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1580
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, for example, a physical taking of customer lists might give rise to a claim for breach of fiduciary duty
- stating courts have not hesitated to protect files as trade secrets where they are secured by years of effort and advertising effected by the expenditure of substantial time and money
- in light of ease of plaintiff’s development of its trade secret customer list, a permanent injunction of three months was found sufficient
- Wrongful or fraudulent tactics employed by defendant in soliciting plaintiffs customers may be enjoined as unfair competition and a court may award damages
- “[W]here the customers are not known in the trade or are discoverable only by extraordinary efforts courts have not hesitated to protect customer lists and files as trade secrets.”
- “A trade secret, like any other secret, is nothing more than private matter; something known to only one or a few and kept from the general public; and not susceptible to general knowledge.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breitel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schroeder v. Pinterest Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-10-06· cited 327×
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-07-13· cited 248×
- North Atlantic Instruments, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Fred Haber and Apex Signal Corp., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppellantsSecond Circuit· 1999-08-09· cited 200×
- Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1977-10-18· cited 160×
- Defiance Button MacHine Company v. C & C Metal Products Corp. And Defiance Button MacHine Company, Inc.Second Circuit· 1985-04-04· cited 123×
- Amoco Production Co. v. LairdIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 91×
- Fmc Corporation v. Taiwan Tainan Giant Industrial Co., Ltd., and Frederick G. FierchSecond Circuit· 1984-03-06· cited 76×
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCS.D. New York· 2011-09-12· cited 76×
- McLaughlin v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-02-03· cited 62×
- Walter Karl, Inc. v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-05-09· cited 60×
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-03· cited 53×
- Poller v. BioScrip, Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-09-25· cited 51×
- American Institute of Chemical Engineers v. Reber-Friel CompanySecond Circuit· 1982-06-28· cited 50×
- Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd.E.D. New York· 1995-10-02· cited 50×
- Family Affair Haircutters, Inc. v. DetlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-04-15· cited 49×
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1986-11-17· cited 47×
- Greenwich Mills Co. v. Barrie House Coffee Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-02-14· cited 47×
- Microbiological Research Corp. v. MunaUtah Supreme Court· 1981-01-22· cited 38×
- Barbagallo v. Marcum LLPE.D. New York· 2011-10-25· cited 37×
- Hancock v. Essential Resources, Inc.S.D. New York· 1992-04-28· cited 34×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals· 1954-01-07· cited 198×
- Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals· 1963-12-30· cited 160×
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-10-13· cited 135×
- S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1919-02-21· cited 59×
- People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1916-01-14· cited 42×
- Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court· 1908-11-15· cited 42×
- Boosing v. DormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-01-24· cited 30×
- Grand Union Tea Co. v. DoddsMichigan Supreme Court· 1910-12-22· cited 21×
- United Insurance Company of America v. DiennoE.D. Pennsylvania· 1965-12-15· cited 19×
- Witkop & Holmes Co. v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1909-03-15· cited 19×
- Abdallah v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1948-01-07· cited 18×
- Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1923-05-11· cited 13×
- Federal Laundry Co. v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court· 1922-03-30· cited 10×
- McLean v. HubbardNew York Supreme Court· 1959-12-28· cited 8×
- Cupid Diaper Service v. AdelmanNew York Supreme Court· 1961-01-30· cited 4×
Other cases named Leo Silfen, Inc. v. Cream
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.