Amoco Production Co. v. Laird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that information generated by Amoco regarding potential oil reserves was not readily ascertainable even though portions of the information were found in the public domain
• holding that information generated by Amoco regarding potential oil reserves was not readily ascertainable even though portions of the information were found in the public domain
• holding that Indiana courts will only engage in statutory interpretation if the language of the statute is ambiguous
• observing \the same information that qualifies as a trade secret under one set of facts may not be afforded protection under a different set of facts\
• the “first and foremost consideration is whether the ... information is readily accessible to a reasonably diligent competitor”
• a survey of potential petroleum fields, which took a great deal of time and effort to develop, was a trade secret

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).