Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no trade secret where prices were publicly disseminated and were outdated
• setting forth requirements for establishing whether information qualifies as a trade secret
• “[W]here a company’s customers are not readily ascertainable, but must be cultivated with great effort and secured through the expenditure of considerable time and money, the names of those customers are protectible trade secrets.” (citations omitted)
• “[B]are allegations, without .more, are insufficient for the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
• “[B]are allegations, without more, are insufficient for the issuance of a preliminary injunction.”
• “[I]rreparable harm is presumed where a trade secret has been misappropriated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).