Fmc Corporation v. Taiwan Tainan Giant Industrial Co., Ltd., and Frederick G. Fierch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ―the loss of 34 Cite as: 2015 UT 80 J. DURHAM, dissenting trade secrets cannot be measured in money damages‖
• concluding that “[a] narrowly drawn injunction should [ ] have been issued based on the misappropriation of trade secret and breach of confidentiality agreement claims”
• holding that loss of trade secrets was an irreparable harm that could not be measured in money because 'a trade secret once lost is, of course, lost forever'
• stating generally that New York follows Restatement of Torts Sec. 757, comment b
• “[I]t is clear that the loss of trade secrets cannot be measured in money damages. A trade secret once lost is, of course, lost forever.” (citations omitted)
• “[I]t is clear that the loss of trade secrets cannot be measured in money damages. . . . A trade secret once lost is, of course, lost forever.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).