Hancock v. Essential Resources, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Preliminary injunctive relief cannot rest on mere hypotheticals.”
• “Preliminary injunctive relief cannot rest on mere hypotheticals.”
• \Preliminary injunctive relief cannot rest on mere hypotheticals.\
• “Preliminary injunctive relief cannot rest on mere hypotheticals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Banks v. Annucci
  N.D. New York· 2014-09-30· cited 59×
• Ivy Mar Co., Inc. v. CR Seasons Ltd.
  E.D. New York· 1995-10-02· cited 50×
• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parisien
  E.D. New York· 2018-11-26· cited 40×
• Tactica International, Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon International, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2001-04-27· cited 23×
• Williams v. Rosenblatt Securities Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2015-10-07· cited 22×
• Kadant, Inc. v. Seeley MacHine, Inc.
  N.D. New York· 2003-01-30· cited 16×
• Hall v. Marshall
  E.D. New York· 2007-03-06· cited 12×
• Innovative Networks, Inc. v. Young
  S.D. New York· 1997-09-17· cited 8×
• Brooks v. Roberts
  N.D. New York· 2017-05-05· cited 5×
• Justice v. Kuhnapfel
  E.D. New York· 2013-11-05· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1979-03-23· cited 1,003×
• Leo Silfen, Inc. v. Cream
  New York Court of Appeals· 1972-01-12· cited 162×
• Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Pico, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-07-09· cited 40×
• Ecolab Inc. v. Paolo
  E.D. New York· 1991-01-03· cited 36×
• Continental Dynamics Corp. v. Ranter
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-09-25· cited 21×
• Churchill Communications Corp. v. Demyanovich
  S.D. New York· 1987-08-10· cited 12×